Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 8;2016:3204818. doi: 10.1155/2016/3204818

Table 3.

Comparison of lipid variables of ART naïve and ART experienced patients at baseline and follow-up.

ART history P
ART naïve (n = 23) ART experienced (n = 148) Total (N = 171)
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
Baseline TC/mmol/L 3.8 0.8 4.7 1.2 4.6 1.2 <0.001
Baseline HDL/mmol/L 1.0 0.2 1.3 0.4 1.2 0.4 <0.001
Baseline LDL/mmol/L 2.3 1.2 2.7 2.2 2.6 2.1 0.376
Baseline TC/HDL ratio 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.3 4.0 1.3 0.818

ART history P ∗∗
ART naïve (n = 23) ART experienced (n = 148) Total (N = 171)
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD

Follow-up TC/mmol/L 3.7 0.8 4.0 1.2 4.0 1.1 0.001
Follow-up HDL/mmol/L 1.4 0.4 1.3 0.5 1.3 0.5 0.002
Follow-up LDL/mmol/L 2.6 0.8 2.5 0.99 2.5 0.96 0.118
Follow-up TC/HDL ratio 2.9 1.04 3.5 2.4 3.4 2.3 0.841

Note: SD: standard deviation; level of significance is set at P < 0.05; P from t-test comparison of means; ∗∗ P from comparisons using generalised linear models (GLM) time group estimates. Mean values, for all 171 patients with complete baseline and follow-up data; TC: total cholesterol; LDL: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; ART: antiretroviral therapy.