Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 18.
Published in final edited form as: Subst Use Misuse. 2015 Nov 18;50(12):1606–1617. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2015.1027927

Table 2.

Prevalence ratios (95% confidence intervals) of current alcohol use and ratios of the average number of drinks per week and day (on heaviest drinking day) among current drinkers associated with neighborhood context for men and women a,b

Prevalence ratios of drinking Ratio of the number of drinks/week Ratio of the highest number of drinks/day
Women

N=3021 N=1229 N=1226
Alcohol outlet density
 Low c 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Moderate 1.15 (0.1.00,1.32)d 0.87 (0.71,1.07) 1.07 (0.95,1.19)
 High 1.10 (0.95,1.28) 1.14 (0.92,1.41) 1.09 (0.94,1.26)
 p-value for trend 0.15 0.80 0.81
Neighborhood disadvantage
 Low c 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Moderate 0.93 (0.83,1.05) 1.12 (0.90,1.40) 0.95 (0.85,1.06)
 High 0.86 (0.74,0.99) 1.08 (0.84,1.39) 0.98 (0.86,1.11)
 p-value for trend 0.05 0.48 0.20

Men

N=2762 N=1619 N=1610
Alcohol outlet density
 Low c 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Moderate 1.05 (0.96,1.14) 1.15 (0.95,1.39) 0.99 (0.90,1.01)
 High 0.94 (0.84,1.04) 1.16 (09.92,1.46)e 1.07 (0.95,1.20)
 p-value for trend 0.23 0.02 0.29
Neighborhood disadvantage
 Low c 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Moderate 0.98 (0.91,1.07) 1.13 (0.97,1.32) 1.04 (0.95,1.05)
 High 0.87 (0.79,0.96) 1.11 (0.92,1.33) 1.10 (0.97,1.25)
 p-value for trend 0.02 0.27 0.15
a

All models are adjusted for age, race, marital status, income, education, job status and study site

b

Model includes both outlet density and neighborhood disadvantage

c

Reference category

d

p-value <0.05 in models of drinking place density

e

p-value <0.05 in models of liquor store density and drinking place density, separately

Note: Bolded values are significant at p<0.05