Table 3.
Ratios (95% confidence intervals) of weekly beer, liquor, and wine consumption associated with neighborhood context among current drinkers a,b
| Beer | Liquor | Wine | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men N=1618 | Women N=1224 | Men N=1615 | Women N=1226 | Men N=1617 | Women N=1228 | |
| Neighborhood | ||||||
| Disadvantage | ||||||
| Low c | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Moderate | 1.14 (0.84,1.57) | 1.67 (0.93,3.01) | 1.17 (0.89,1.53) | 1.01 (0.68,1.50) | 1.12 (0.86,1.45) | 1.16 (0.89,1.51) |
| High | 1.40 (0.96,2.04) | 2.86 (1.59,5.12) | 0.97 (0.72,1.31) | 1.13 (0.74,1.72) | 0.86 (0.63,1.17) | 0.82 (0.60,1.13) |
| p-value for trend | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.84 | 0.95 | 0.38 | 0.16 |
| Alcohol outlet density | ||||||
| Low c | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Moderate | 1.03 (0.78,1.38) | 0.87 (0.54,1.42) | 1.03 (0.74,1.44) | 0.63 (0.42,0.94) | 1.25 (0.98,1.59) | 0.96(0.72, 1.28) |
| High | 1.37 (0.94,2.00) | 0.73 (0.43,1.24) | 1.04 (0.72,1.49) | 0.91 (0.58,1.43) | 1.31 (0.94,1.82) | 1.30 (0.96,1.78)d |
| p-value for trend | 0.11 | 0.26 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 0.11 | 0.16 |
a
All models are adjusted for age, race, marital status, income, education, job status and study site
b
Model includes both outlet density and neighborhood disadvantage
c
Reference category
d
p-value <0.05 in models of liquor store density and drinking place density, separately
Bolded values are significant at p<0.05