Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 29;7(2):94–107. doi: 10.1177/2040620715623924

Table 5.

Outcome of HCV-associated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma according to the type of treatment.

Reference Study design No. of patients Treatment Outcomes
Tomita et al. [2003]* retrospective 25* CHOP/CHOP-like 5-year OS 46% -
Besson et al. [2006] retrospective 26 intensive chemotherapy 3-year OS 56% 3-year EFS 53%
Visco et al. [2006] retrospective 156 R-CHOP(35)/CHOP or CHOP-like 3-year OS 72% 3-year PFS 51%
Park et al. [2008] retrospective 32 R-CHOP(11)/CHOP 5-year OS 59% 55% (5 year)
Ennishi et al. [2010] retrospective 131 R-CHOP 3-year OS 75% 3-year PFS 69%
Merli et al. [2014] retrospective 535 R-CHOP(255)/CHOP 3-year OS 71% (71% R-CHOP) 3-year PFS 55% (58% R-CHOP)
Michot et al. [2015]§ prospective 27$ R-CHOP/R-ACVBP 2-year OS 81% 2-year PFS 80%
Chen et al. [2015] retrospective R-CHOP/R-CHOP-like 3-year OS 55% 3-year PFS 52%
*

The working formulation was used to define histology by Tomita, who reports 20 large cell lymphomas and other aggressive histological types (including four cases of T-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma).

$

The analysis of survival was restricted only to the patients prospectively enrolled in the study by Michot.

CHOP, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, doxorubicin; EFS, event-free survival; n.r., not reported; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; R-ACVBP, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, prednisone plus rituximab; R-CHOP, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, doxorubicin plus rituximab; RFS, relapse-free survival.