Table 8.

Agreement and disagreement among metabolic syndrome definitions in pregnant women with metabolic syndrome and the diagnostic criteria according to each definition

Definitions	Concordance			Diagnostic accuracy (%)
	k-value (95 % CI)	p value	Agreement	Sensitivity	Specificity	PPV	NPV
Bartha vs NCEP ATP III	0.0841 (0.0390–0.1293)	<0.0001	Poor	100	72.1	6.1	100
NCEP ATP III vs Bartha	0.0841 (0.0390–0.1293)	<0.0001	Poor	6.1	100	100	72.1
Bartha vs Chatzi	0.2232 (0.1172–0.3292)	<0.0001	Considerable	100	88.9	14.1	100
Chatzi vs Bartha	0.2232 (0.1172–0.3292)	<0.0001	Considerable	14.1	100	100	88.9
Bartha vs JIS	0.0608 (0.0275–0.0941)	<0.0001	Poor	100	64.6	4.9	100
JIS vs Bartha	0.0608 (0.0275–0.0941)	<0.0001	Poor	4.9	100	100	100
NECP ATP III vs JIS	0.8332 (0.7894–0.8771)	<0.0001	Excellent	100	89.5	79.8	100
JIS vs NECP ATP III	0.8332 (0.7894–0.8771)	<0.0001	Excellent	79.8	100	100	89.5
NCEP ATP III vs Chatzi	0.4320 (0.3076–0.5064)	<0.0001	Moderate	38.1	97.9	88.2	79.3
Chatzi vs NCEP ATP III	0.4320 (0.3076–0.5064)	<0.0001	Moderate	88.2	79.3	38.1	97.9
Chatzi vs JIS	0.4036 (0.3389–0.4684)	<0.0001	Considerable	100	72.5	34.4	100
JIS vs Chatzi	0.4036 (0.3389–0.4684)	<0.0001	Considerable	34.4	100	100	72.5