Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Inverse Probl Imaging (Springfield). 2015 May;9(2):431–446. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.431

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Left, center: Relative errors of L1ε reconstructions vs. number of projections at different noise levels. Same spikes image instances as in Fig. 3 with relative sparsity values κ = 0.2 (left) and κ = 0.6 (center). Right: Average relative sampling for L1ε recovery and 99% confidence intervals for different noise levels showing similar transitions. The “δ = 0” case is the noise-free L1 result for reference.