Table 4. Parameter estimates and model evaluation statistics of each biomass model for the mature forest.
Component | model | a | b | c | d | R2 | MAPE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eq (7) | |||||||
Trunk | -0.963* | 2.032* | - | - | 0.936 | 0.105 | |
Branch | -3.945* | 2.349* | - | - | 0.681 | 0.394 | |
Leaf | -4.108* | 2.270* | - | - | 0.488 | 0.399 | |
Root | -3.566* | 2.525* | - | - | 0.909 | 0.132 | |
Eq (8) | |||||||
Trunk | -0.890* | 2.050* | -0.044 | - | 0.936 | 0.105 | |
Branch | -4.297* | 2.262* | 0.218 | - | 0.689 | 0.394 | |
Leaf | -4.652* | 2.136* | 0.337 | - | 0.491 | 0.398 | |
Root | -3.379* | 2.571* | -0.116 | - | 0.910 | 0.132 | |
Eq (9) | |||||||
Trunk | -0.890* | 1.985* | 0.042 | - | 0.937 | 0.106 | |
Branch | -4.159* | 2.488* | -0.124 | - | 0.681 | 0.396 | |
Leaf | -3.187* | 1.672* | 0.532* | - | 0.503 | 0.380 | |
Root | -3.170* | 2.268* | 0.228* | - | 0.921 | 0.126 | |
Eq (10) | |||||||
Trunk | -2.081* | 0.819* | - | - | 0.909 | 0.116 | |
Branch | -5.313* | 0.956* | - | - | 0.692 | 0.384 | |
Leaf | -5.466* | 0.927* | - | - | 0.483 | 0.406 | |
Root | -4.938* | 1.016* | - | - | 0.868 | 0.154 | |
Eq (11) | |||||||
Trunk | -1.804* | 0.767* | 0.116 | - | 0.914 | 0.116 | |
Branch | -5.467* | 0.985* | -0.064 | - | 0.691 | 0.385 | |
Leaf | -4.129* | 0.671* | 0.559* | - | 0.502 | 0.385 | |
Root | -4.165* | 0.868* | 0.323* | - | 0.893 | 0.153 | |
Eq (12) | |||||||
Trunk | -0.806* | 2.004* | -0.050 | 0.043 | 0.936 | 0.106 | |
Branch | -4.551* | 2.403* | 0.235 | -0.131 | 0.689 | 0.395 | |
Leaf | -3.641 | 1.573* | 0.271 | 0.523* | 0.506 | 0.380 | |
Root | -2.928* | 2.320* | -0.145 | 0.233* | 0.922 | 0.126 |
Note: Values in bold denote the best statistic among six biomass models for each component.
* means significant at 0.05 level.