Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Jul 18;34(4):928–934. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22701

Figure 5.

Figure 5

1.5T MRI-determined PDFF versus 1.5T MRS-determined PDFF. This graph illustrates the high fat estimation accuracy of MRI-determined PDFF, using MRS-determined PDFF as the reference standard, at 1.5T (r = 0.993). The slope of the regression equation was 0.958 and the intercept was −0.48. On average, the MRI-determined PDFF estimates were higher than MRS-determined PDFF estimates by 1.15% (P = 0.0015). The dotted line is the line of equality. The solid line is the regression line.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure