Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 18;129:308–319. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.017

Table 1.

Operational definition of the attentional network effects and interactions for behavior performance

Testing condition minus Reference condition
Network effects
Alerting No cue Double cue
Disengaging Invalid cue Double cue
Moving + Engaging a Double cue Valid cue
Validity b Invalid cue Valid cue
Conflict Incongruent Congruent
Interactions
Alerting by Flanker Conflict No cue, incongruent Double cue, incongruent
minus minus
No cue, congruent Double cue, congruent
Validity by Flanker Conflict Invalid cue, incongruent Valid cue, incongruent
minus minus
Invalid cue, congruent Valid cue, congruent
a

The “Moving + Engaging” is equivalent to the “orienting” effect originally defined in (Fan et al., 2009). However, here we defined the orienting effect with the disengaging component included, which is the validity effect.

b

The validity effect = Disengaging + (Moving + Engaging).