Table 2.
Published studies of corneal inlays in pseudophakic patients.
| Publication | Number of patients, IOL type | Technique | Length of follow-up | Change in monocular (and binocular) visual | Illumination conditions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| acuities for uncorrected distance and near vision | ||||||
| Change in UNVA (tested at 30 cm) | Change in UDVA (tested at 20 feet unless otherwise indicated) | |||||
| Huseynova et al., 2013 [11] | 3, phakic IOLs | Kamra (2 patients had prior LASIK) |
3 months | 2–5 lines (J4 to J2, J6 to J4, and J10 to J5) | No change in mean | Not mentioned |
|
| ||||||
| Huseynova et al., 2014 [12] | 13, monofocal IOLs | Kamra (4 patients underwent simultaneous or prior LASIK) |
3 months | 5 lines mean improvement (J10 to J4) | No change in mean | “Standard bright light conditions” |
|
| ||||||
| Stojanovic et al., 2014 [13] | 1, monofocal IOL | Presbia Microlens | 2 years | J3 to J1 (binocular J3 to J1) | 20/25 to 20/32 (binocular 20/20, no change) | Not mentioned |
|
| ||||||
| Ziaei and Mearza, 2013 [14] | 1, monofocal IOL | Kamra (simultaneous LASIK) | 6 months | J17 to J3 | 6/10 to 6/5 | Not mentioned |
N.B. Intermediate visual acuity was not reported in any of these studies. Except where indicated, binocular visual acuities were not reported in these studies.