Table 6.

Ejaculation.

Authors, year	n	Study type	Questionnaire	Follow-up (months)	Urethroplasty	Age (median)	Results
Singh et al., 2010 [32]	150	R	BMSFI	>3	AU	40	Mean preop BMSFI Ej: 4,7; postop: 6,3 P < 0,001, improved
Sharma et al., 2011 [27]	34	P	BMSFI	3	AU	34,6	Mean preop BMSFI Ej: 4,68; postop: 6,71 P = 0,00, improved
Erickson et al., 2007 [33]	52	R	BMSFI	4	AU	41,7	Mean preop BMSFI Ej: 5,3; postop: 6,2 P < 0,04, improved
Barbagli et al., 2008 [3]	60	R	N. Valid.	68	AU∗	39	23% ejaculatory dysfunction
Erickson et al., 2010 [61]	43	P	MSHQ	6,8	AU	40,4	Mean preop MSHQ Ej: 25,54; postop: 26,94 P = 0,17, NSD overall  70% no change 19% improved 11% decreased
El-Assmy et al., 2015 [62]	58	R	MSHQ	61,3	PU	31,6	8,6 ejaculatory dysfunction
Anger et al., 2008 [63]	32	R	N. Valid.	58,8	PU	38,6	100% antegrade ejaculation 15,6% decreased volume

BMSFI: Brief Male Sexual Function Inventory; MSHQ: Male Sexual Health Questionnaire; AU: anterior urethroplasty; ^∗100% end-to-end anastomosis; NSD: no statistical difference.