Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 23;4(2):e00212. doi: 10.1002/prp2.212

Table 1.

Significant difference among 24, 48, and 72 h after treatment (repeated‐measures ANOVA)

Cell lines Concentration (nmol/L) Type III sum of squares df Mean square F value P value
MCF‐7 10 0.026 2 0.013 4.755 0.035
100 0.279 2 0.140 29.314 0.000
200 0.338 2 0.169 56.770 0.000
500 0.546 2 0.273 76.405 0.000
MDA‐MB‐231 10 0.033 2 0.016 2.401 0.141
100 0.078 2 0.039 4.566 0.039
200 0.244 2 0.122 15.192 0.001
500 0.629 2 0.314 31.033 0.000
Hs 578Bst 10 0.046 2 0.023 0.993 0.404
100 0.113 2 0.056 2.728 0.113
200 0.070 2 0.035 2.488 0.133
500 0.037 2 0.019 0.947 0.420

Based on MTT analysis, MCF‐7, MDA‐MB‐231 and Hs 578Bst were exposed to deguelin at indicated concentrations (0–500 nmol/L) for 24, 48, 72 h. Cell viability was measured by a spectrophotometer. A repeated‐measures ANOVA was used to see if the time points are significantly different to each other in three cell lines. As the P values in Mauchly's Test of Sphericity are all more than 0.05, sphericity has not been violated. The results in “sphericity assumed” in SPSS were presented in the table. ANOVA, analysis of variance; MTT, 3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐diphenyltetrazolium bromide.

*< 0.05; **< 0.01; ***< 0.001.