Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 26.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2015 Nov 2;527(7579):539–543. doi: 10.1038/nature15519

Extended Data Figure 5. Structural comparison of the active site topologies between FtmOx1 and TauD.

Extended Data Figure 5

a, Examination of the alternative configuration of α -KG in the FtmOx1–α -KG binary complex using the configuration of α -KG in the TauD–α -KG binary complex. We modelled α -KG in this alternative binding mode and calculated the difference map. In the FoFc map, strong positive density (green) and negative density (red) are shown even when contoured to high level (3.3σ), indicating that this configuration is not correct for the FtmOx1–α -KG complex. b, The FoFc map at the active site of the FtmOx1–fumitremorgin B complex. A model of the substrate fumitremorgin B is superimposed onto the difference map, which is contoured at 2.8σ. c, Side-by-side comparison of FtmOx1 and TauD active-site topologies. In the left panel, the superimposition of the binary structures of FtmOx1–α -KG and FtmOx1–fumitremorgin-B (1) show that the remaining site for oxygen binding and activation is blocked from the substrate by Y224. d, In contrast, in the structure of the TauD–taurine–α -KG tertiary complex, the remaining site for O2 binding and activation directly faces the substrate (taurine).