Table 2.
Overall Model Fit
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1-class | 2-class | 3-class | 4-class | |
|
||||
saBIC | 1048.07 | 795.55 | 404.27 | 665.85 |
Entropy | 1.00 | .936 | .971 | .967 |
ALC-Prob. | - | .958–.987 | .98 – 1.0 | .92 – 1.0 |
% sample/class | ||||
1 | 65 (100%) | 22 (35%) | 21 (34%) | 9 (15%) |
2 | 40 (65%) | 27 (44%) | 13 (21%) | |
3 | 14 (23%) | 26 (42%) | ||
4 | 14 (23%) | |||
LMR (p-value) | - | 196.29 (.00) | 102.12 (.00) | 50.23 (.54) |
Notes: sample size adjusted Bayesian information criterion; ALC-Prob. = average latent class probability for most likely latent class membership; LRM = Lo-Mendell-Rubin adjusted likelihood ratio test. Wald tests of equality were used to compare profiles in models with more than one class on follow-up percent days abstinent. Thus, in the 1-class model the total N is 65, as there were no classes to compare; the total N is 62 for the 2- through 4-class models due to the loss of 3 participants who failed to provide follow-up data.