Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 23.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Addict Behav. 2016 Mar;30(2):184–193. doi: 10.1037/adb0000161

Table 2.

Comparative latent profile analysis overall model fit statistics for client reports on the therapeutic alliance.

Overall Model Fit
1-class 2-class 3-class 4-class

saBIC 1048.07 795.55 404.27 665.85
Entropy 1.00 .936 .971 .967
ALC-Prob. - .958–.987 .98 – 1.0 .92 – 1.0
% sample/class
1 65 (100%) 22 (35%) 21 (34%) 9 (15%)
2 40 (65%) 27 (44%) 13 (21%)
3 14 (23%) 26 (42%)
4 14 (23%)
LMR (p-value) - 196.29 (.00) 102.12 (.00) 50.23 (.54)

Notes: sample size adjusted Bayesian information criterion; ALC-Prob. = average latent class probability for most likely latent class membership; LRM = Lo-Mendell-Rubin adjusted likelihood ratio test. Wald tests of equality were used to compare profiles in models with more than one class on follow-up percent days abstinent. Thus, in the 1-class model the total N is 65, as there were no classes to compare; the total N is 62 for the 2- through 4-class models due to the loss of 3 participants who failed to provide follow-up data.