Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 23.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Addict Behav. 2016 Mar;30(2):184–193. doi: 10.1037/adb0000161

Table 3.

Comparative latent profile analysis overall model fit statistics for therapist reports on the therapeutic alliance.

Overall Model Fit
1-class 2-class 3-class 4-class

saBIC 968.079 774.26 698.48 636.45
Entropy 1.00 .95 .95 .97
ALC-Prob. Range - .98 – 1.0 .97 – 1.0 .97 – 1.0
% sample/class
1 65 (100%) 25 (40%) 18 (29%) 19 (31%)
2 37 (60%) 24 (39%) 20 (32%)
3 20 (32%) 18 (29%)
4 5 (8%)
LMR (p-value) - 139.36 (.00) 86.91 (.03) 78.85 (.91)

Notes: sample size adjusted Bayesian information criterion; ALC-Prob. = average latent class probability for most likely latent class membership; LRM = Lo-Mendell-Rubin adjusted likelihood ratio test. Wald tests of equality were used to compare profiles in models with more than one class on follow-up percent days abstinent. Thus, in the 1-class model the total N is 65, as there were no classes to compare; the total N is 62 for the 2- through 4-class models due to the loss of 3 participants who failed to provide follow-up data.