Table 3.
Overall Model Fit
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1-class | 2-class | 3-class | 4-class | |
|
||||
saBIC | 968.079 | 774.26 | 698.48 | 636.45 |
Entropy | 1.00 | .95 | .95 | .97 |
ALC-Prob. Range | - | .98 – 1.0 | .97 – 1.0 | .97 – 1.0 |
% sample/class | ||||
1 | 65 (100%) | 25 (40%) | 18 (29%) | 19 (31%) |
2 | 37 (60%) | 24 (39%) | 20 (32%) | |
3 | 20 (32%) | 18 (29%) | ||
4 | 5 (8%) | |||
LMR (p-value) | - | 139.36 (.00) | 86.91 (.03) | 78.85 (.91) |
Notes: sample size adjusted Bayesian information criterion; ALC-Prob. = average latent class probability for most likely latent class membership; LRM = Lo-Mendell-Rubin adjusted likelihood ratio test. Wald tests of equality were used to compare profiles in models with more than one class on follow-up percent days abstinent. Thus, in the 1-class model the total N is 65, as there were no classes to compare; the total N is 62 for the 2- through 4-class models due to the loss of 3 participants who failed to provide follow-up data.