Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 23.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Jun;23(3):147–158. doi: 10.1037/pha0000017

Table 2.

Multilevel models (MLM) examining ADHD symptoms and sensation seeking as predictors of go/no-go task performance during the alcohol infusion.

Go/No Go Task

Inhibition Failures (proportion) Go RT to Go Cues (ms)

B SE t p B SE t p
ADHD Model
    Time (G1 vs. G2) .040** .012 3.44 .001 −1.08 2.29 −0.47 .639
    Time (G2 vs. G3) .044** .010 4.28 .000 2.81 2.83 0.99 .324
    ADHD .001 .009 0.01 .993 −3.94 2.92 −1.35 .180
    ADHD*Time (G1 vs. G2) −.008 .012 −0.73 .469 −1.62 2.32 −0.70 .488
    ADHD* Time (G2 vs. G3) .032** .011 3.03 .003 1.56 2.91 0.54 .594
SS Model
    Time (G1 vs. G2) .040** .012 3.43 .001 −1.04 2.29 −0.45 .653
    Time (G2 vs. G3) .043** .010 4.18 .000 2.73 2.81 0.97 .334
    SS .008 .009 0.91 .364 −0.36 2.96 −0.12 .903
    SS*Time (G1 vs. G2) −.009 .012 −0.79 .433 0.73 2.32 0.31 .754
    SS*Time (G2 vs. G3) .031** .010 2.97 .004 −1.37 2.82 −0.49 .628

Note. G1=baseline; G2= approximately 40 min after the start of the alcohol infusion; G3 = approximately 90 min after the start of the infusion; ADHD=ADHD symptom count; SS = sensation seeking;

*

p<.05

**

p<.01.