Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 23;11(3):e0150726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150726

Table 4. Comparison of delivery interventions among women exposed versus non-exposed to sexual violence.

Full dataset Sub-samplea
Non-exposed women Exposed women Non-exposed women Exposed women
n % n % RRb 95% CI n % n % RRc 95% CI Adj RRcd 95% CI
Total 9126 89.5 1068 10.5 1614 64.1 903 35.9
Elective cesarean section 427 4.7 43 4.0 0.86 0.61–1.21 84 5.2 30 3.3 0.92 0.59–1.45 1.18 0.74–1.88
Totale 8699 89.5 1025 10.5 1530 63.7 873 36.3
Emergency cesarean section 842 9.7 117 11.4 1.18 0.97–1.44 161 10.5 102 11.7 1.29 0.99–1.67 1.26 0.94–1.69
Instrumental vaginal delivery 698 8.0 93 9.1 1.13 0.91–1.40 114 7.5 84 9.6 1.29 0.98–1.70 1.30 0.96–1.74
Emergency instrumental deliveryf 1540 17.7 210 20.5 1.16 1.00–1.34 275 18.0 186 21.3 1.29 1.07–1.56 1.28 1.05–1.58

aExposed and non-exposed women within our previous dataset with manually retrieved information on smoking and BMI.

bRelative Risks with non-exposed women as a reference group. Data matched on age, parity and season of delivery.

cRelative Risks with non-exposed women as a reference group. Data adjusted for age, parity, year and month of delivery.

dAdditionally adjusted for smoking (in 2 categories, no/quit vs. yes) and body mass index (BMI).

eWomen who underwent elective cesarean section were excluded from other analysis in this table.

fEither emergency cesarean section or instrumental vaginal delivery.