Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Res. 2016 Jan 29;94(5):409–423. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23714

Table 2.

Rotometry (seconds on rota-rod before falling)

Vehicle Rx Group GCSF Rx Group
Before CCI 128.20 ± 5.35 n=10 109.20 ± 7.86 n=10
7d post CCI 87.85 ± 10.78 n=10 83.41 ± 5.32 n=10
14d post CCI 102.10 ± 9.38 n=10 82.77 ± 4.53 n=10

2-way ANOVA of the rotometery data revealed time after CCI accounted for 26% of the variation (p<0.0001) and treatment with either G-CSF or vehicle contributed 6.4% of total variation (p=0.02). Comparison of row means (Sidak Multiple comparisons test) showed no significant differences between G-CSF and vehicle treated mice at each time point.