Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Imaging Behav. 2016 Sep;10(3):697–706. doi: 10.1007/s11682-015-9449-6

Table 1. Sample characteristics, mobility measures, and neuroimaging markers for all three groups.

Young1
(aged < 50)
N=51
Young-old2
(aged 50-70)
N=209
Old-old3
(aged 70-96)
N=233
p-value Pairwise
comparison
test
Characteristics
Age, years 42.1±5.4 62.1±4.9 78.2±5.4 <.001 1<2, 2<3, 1<3
Female 24 (47.1) 136 (65.1) 114 (48.9) 0.001 1<2, 2>3
Education, years 17±2 17±3 17±3 0.391 -
Black 10 (19.6) 63 (30.1) 45 (19.3) 0.021 -
Height, m 1.72±0.10 1.68±0.09 1.67±0.10 0.001 1>2, 1>3
Weight, kg 79.6±18.5 78.8±16.4 74.3±13.6 0.005 2>3
Body mass index, kg/m2 26.8±6.0 27.7±4.8 26.6±3.9 0.025 2<3
Health-related conditions
Smoker 5 (10.2) 13 (6.3) 5 (2.2) 0.020 1>3, 2>3
Leg pain when walking 3 (6.0) 41 (19.6) 28 (12.0) 0.071 -
Difficulty walking ¼ mile 1 (2.1) 9 (4.3) 7 (3.0) 0.647 -
Osteoarthritis of knees 1 (2.0) 59 (28.2) 71 (30.5) 0.002 1<2
Walking ability score 8.7±1.2 8.3±1.7 8.1±1.6 0.031 1>3
Mobility measures
Lap time variation, sec 0.64±0.26 0.71±0.30 0.87±0.42 <.001 2<3, 1<3
Mean lap time, sec 21.8±2.6 24.9±3.1 28.9±6.0 <.001 1<2, 2<3,1<3
Microstructural white matter integrity: Fractional anisotropy
Uncinate fasciculus 0.3579±0.0407 0.3565±0.0402 0.3536±0.0431 0.692 -
Superior longitudinal
fasciculus
0.4614±0.0206 0.4484±0.0238 0.4452±0.0337 0.001 1>2, 1>3
Inferior fronto-occipital
fasciculus
0.3981±0.0249 0.3810±0.0242 0.3695±0.0299 <.001 1>2, 2>3, 1>3
Genu of corpus callosum 0.5584±0.0487 0.5196±0.0541 0.4661±0.0721 <.001 1>2, 2>3, 1>3
Body of corpus callosum 0.5446±0.0327 0.5304±0.0378 0.4995±0.0523 <.001 2>3, 1>3
Splenium of corpus
callosum
0.6289±0.0292 0.6242±0.0299 0.6032±0.0565 <.001 2>3, 1>3
Anterior limb of the
internal capsule
0.5333±0.0302 0.5259±0.0363 0.5091±0.0514 <.001 2>3, 1>3
Anterior corona radiate 0.4202±0.0280 0.3918±0.0299 0.3607±0.0356 <.001 1>2, 2>3, 1>3
Macrostructural white
matter damage
0.0004±0.0017 0.0012±0.0026 0.0040±0.0057 <.001 2<3, 1<3

Note: Samples were free of Parkinson’s and stroke and did not use a walking aid for the 400m walk. Values were mean ± SD or N (%) as noted. Macrostructural white matter damage was expressed as a ratio of total volume of white matter hyperintensities to the intracranial volume.