Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 28;22(12):3325–3334. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i12.3325

Table 1.

Selection criteria in different centers for hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria

Criteria Year Country Sample size
Contents of criteria Survival (5-yr)
DDLT LDLT OS RFS
UCSF[7] 2001 America 70 0 Tumor ≤ 6.5 cm, or ≤ 3 nodules with the largest ≤ 4.5 cm and a total tumor ≤ 8 cm 75.2% None
Up-to-7[8] 2009 Italy 1404 121 The sum of the tumor number and the size of the largest tumor no larger than 7 cm 71.2% None
Tokyo[9] 2007 Japan 0 78 Tumors no larger than 5 cm and no more than 5 nodules 75.0% 94% (3-yr)
Hangzhou[12] 2008 China 195 0 Tumor ≤ 8 cm, or tumor > 8 cm, histopathologic grade I or II and preoperative AFP ≤ 400 ng/mL 78.3% 62.4%
Kyoto[6] 2007 Japan 0 125 Tumor ≤ 10 nodules, all ≤ 5 cm and a serum DCP level ≤ 400 mAU/mL 86.7% None
Shanghai[14] 2009 China 1074 4 Tumor ≤ 9 cm, or ≤ 3 lesions with the largest ≤ 5 cm, tumor ≤ 9 cm without macrovascular and lymph node invasion and extrahepatic metastasis 78.1% 52.6%
Asan[11] 2008 South Korea 0 221 Tumor ≤ 5 cm in diameter, ≤ 6 in nodule number, and free of gross vascular invasion 81.6% None

UCSF: University Of California San Francisco; LDLT: Living donor liver transplantation; DDLT: Deceased donor liver transplantation; OS: Overall survival; RFS: Relapse free survival.