Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 28;22(12):3325–3334. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i12.3325

Table 2.

Tumor markers and the cut-off of different selection criteria

Markers Authors Cut-off Other content Survival (5-yr)
OS RFS
AFP Zheng et al[12] AFP ≤ 400 Hangzhou criteria 78.3% 62.4%
Toso et al[27] AFP ≤ 400 Total tumor volume ≤ 115 cm3 None None
Wan et al[20] AFP ≤ 400 Tumor ≤ 10 cm, no vascular and extrahepatic invasions 73.7% 74.4%
DCP Ito et al[6] DCP ≤ 400 Tumor size ≤ 10 cm 86.7% None
Soejima et al[13] DCP ≤ 300 Tumor size ≤ 5 cm None 93.8% (3-yr)
NLR Xiao et al[43] NLR < 4 None 61.5% 60.7%
AFP/CA199 Wan et al[30] AFP ≤ 400, CA199 ≤ 400 None 74.6% 78.5%
NLR/CRP Na et al[47] NLR < 6.0 or CRP < 1.0 None None None
DCP/AFP Todo et al[35] DCP ≤ 100, AFP ≤ 200 Milan criteria None 96.4%
Shindoh et al[36] AFP ≤ 250, DCP ≤ 450 Tokyo criteria 84.0% 96.8%

AFP: Alpha fetoprotein; DCP: Des-Gamma-carboxy prothrombin; NLR: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; OS: Overall survival; RFS: Relapse free survival.