Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Mar;64(3):501–509. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14013

Table 2.

Average intervention effect on adjusted least squares mean valuesa for continuous respiratory outcomes across 30-months of follow-up

Intervention Group Borg Index (Dyspnea Severity)b FEV1 (Breathing Capacity)c MIP (Respiratory Muscle Strength)d
Average Intervention Effect Across 30-Month Follow-Up Least Squares Means (95% CI)e
Physical Activity (PA) 1.84 (1.69, 1.88) 1.93 (1.82, 1.85) 63.21 (61.60, 64.82)
Health Education (HE) 1.79 (1.75, 1.93) 1.93 (1.81, 1.84) 62.77 (61.17, 64.37)
Difference (PA – HE) 0.05 (−0.07, 0.17) 0.00 (−0.05, 0.05) 0.44 (−1.58, 2.46)

CI, confidence interval; FEV1, Forced expiratory volume in 1 second; MIP, maximal inspiratory pressure; SD, standard deviation.

a

Adjusted for field center and gender

b

Dyspnea scale of 0–10, recorded immediately after the 400-m walk test.

c

FEV1 in liters.

d

MIP in cm H2O.

e

There was no statistical evidence of follow-up visit by intervention interaction (p≥.13 for all).