Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 23;16:78. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0790-0

Table 2.

Results univariable logistic model and backward logistic regression multivariable model

Univariable Multivariable
Model 1a Model 2b
OR 95 % CI p OR 95 % CI p OR 95 % CI p
Age 0.99 0.97–1.01 0.42 0.99 0.97–1.01 0.42
Partner status 1.48 0.65–3.37 0.34 0.76 0.27–2.17 0.61
Severity complaints(1) 1.33 0.46–3.86 0.59 1.19 0.31–.4.48 0.79
Severity complaints(2) 1.11 0.42–2.92 0.82 0.92 0.24–3.45 0.90
Duration complaints 2.60c 1.05–6.41 0.03* 2.59 0.80–8.43 0.11 2.80 1.06–7.37 0.03*
Comorbidity anxiety 1.57 0.68–3.58 0.28 1.28 0.38–4.28 0.68
Comorbidity physical 0.80 0.25–2.51 0.70 0.96 0.25–3.78 0.96
Neuroticism 1.01 0.95–1.07 0.63 0.98 0.90–1.07 0.98
Loneliness 0.61 0.20–1.88 0.39 0.59 0.15–2.36 0.45
Personal stigma 0.89d, e 0.83–0.96 0.005* 0.91 0.83–0.99 0.04* 0.90 0.84–0.98 0.009*
Perceived stigma 0.99 0.91–1.07 0.85 0.98 0.88–1.09 0.77

Model (χ 2 = 11.92, p = 0.009, df = 2). Note. OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval, *Significant at .05

aModel 1 represents the first model

bModel 2 represents the final model

c( χ 2 = 4.31, p = 0.03, df = 1)

dControlled for three residuals that seem to influence the model

e(χ 2 = 6.39, p = 0.01, df = 1)