Table 2.
Summary of methods discussed for predicting survival
| Method | Sparsity | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cox prop. hazards | No | Only applies if columns of X not multicollinear | Kalbfleisch and Prentice16 |
| Univariate selection | Yes | Does not find best multivariate model | Klein and Moeschberger63 |
| Stepwise selection | Yes | Computationally intensive; not global optimum | Klein and Moeschberger63 |
| L2 shrinkage | No | Resulting coefficients can be small, but non-zero | Verweij and van Houwelingen28 |
| L1 shrinkage | Yes | Dimension reduction and feature selection are integrated into one step | Tibshirani29 |
| Covariance-regularised regression | Yes | Sparsity results if p2 = 1 | Witten and Tibshirani36 |
| Tree harvesting | Maybe | In general, not sparse; depends on clusters included in model | Hastie et al.39 |
| Principal component regression | No | Outcome is regressed onto high-variance subspace of features | Massy40 |
| SIR + PC | No | PC is followed by SIR44in order to reduce dimension before fitting survival model | Li and Li43 |
| Supervised PC | Yes | PC is performed only on the features with highest Cox scores | Bair and Tibshirani41 |
| PLS + Cox prop. hazards | No | PLS used to reduce dimension before fitting a survival model | Nguyen and Rocke47 |
| PCR (PLS for Cox model) | No | PLS regression adapted to the survival setting | Park et al.48 |