Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 24.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Methods Med Res. 2009 Aug 4;19(1):29–51. doi: 10.1177/0962280209105024

Table 2.

Summary of methods discussed for predicting survival

Method Sparsity Description Reference
Cox prop. hazards No Only applies if columns of X not multicollinear Kalbfleisch and Prentice16
Univariate selection Yes Does not find best multivariate model Klein and Moeschberger63
Stepwise selection Yes Computationally intensive; not global optimum Klein and Moeschberger63
L2 shrinkage No Resulting coefficients can be small, but non-zero Verweij and van Houwelingen28
L1 shrinkage Yes Dimension reduction and feature selection are integrated into one step Tibshirani29
Covariance-regularised regression Yes Sparsity results if p2 = 1 Witten and Tibshirani36
Tree harvesting Maybe In general, not sparse; depends on clusters included in model Hastie et al.39
Principal component regression No Outcome is regressed onto high-variance subspace of features Massy40
SIR + PC No PC is followed by SIR44in order to reduce dimension before fitting survival model Li and Li43
Supervised PC Yes PC is performed only on the features with highest Cox scores Bair and Tibshirani41
PLS + Cox prop. hazards No PLS used to reduce dimension before fitting a survival model Nguyen and Rocke47
PCR (PLS for Cox model) No PLS regression adapted to the survival setting Park et al.48