Table 3. mtDNA ratio statistics in young series samples.
Class | Sample type | ♀ | ♂ | mdn F | F MAD | avg F | F s.d. | mdn Fm | Fm MAD | avg Fm | Fm s.d. | mdn M | M MAD | avg M | M s.d. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | w | 5 | 5 | 7.77 | 2.93 | 7.34 | 2.57 | 10.60 | 1.65 | 10.40 | 4.83 | 5.50E–04 | 8.12E–04 | 2.33E–03 | 3.63E–03 |
2 | w | 2 | 3 | 7.58 | 4.29 | 8.05 | 3.55 | 9.26 | 9.89 | 18.72 | 19.50 | 1.46E–03 | 8.65E–04 | 1.78E–03 | 1.28E–03 |
b | 6 | 2 | 5.57 | 3.85 | 7.44 | 5.86 | 9.36 | 7.08 | 10.60 | 6.37 | 1.02 | 1.52 | 1.71 | 2.04 | |
w+b | 8 | 5 | 5.57 | 3.85 | 7.59 | 5.31 | 9.26 | 9.74 | 15.33 | 15.77 | 1.84E–03 | 1.43E–03 | 1.85E–03 | 1.54 | |
a | 5 | 2 | 27.64 | 7.42 | 52.64 | 67.86 | 47.36 | 21.73 | 78.24 | 66.56 | 0 | NA | 0 | NA | |
m | 6 | 2 | 13.56 | 9.94 | 16.13 | 12.41 | 27.01 | 30.99 | 33.23 | 30.85 | 0 | NA | 0 | NA | |
3 | b | 3 | 2 | 4 565.40 | 2 438.17 | 39 252.27 | 56 208.46 | 1 301.27 | 726.83 | 1 273.84 | 580.15 | 75.92 | 74.02 | 84.45 | 61.38 |
4 | b | 8 | 8 | 44 916.26 | 40 672.72 | 71 661.11 | 62 589.45 | 337.77 | 413.25 | 650.57 | 712.82 | 485.17 | 322.14 | 1 309.54 | 1 704.89 |
a | 3 | 3 | 8 144.11 | 2 716.40 | 23 105.73 | 23 845.21 | 5 406.84 | 2 955.24 | 6 781.18 | 3 737.75 | 10.66 | 0.80 | 12.69 | 3.99 | |
m | 4 | 4 | 2 952.54 | 957.90 | 3 019.82 | 846.25 | 1 754.79 | 897.45 | 1 683.86 | 898.44 | 71.98 | 3.76 | 66.23 | 12.23 |
Abbreviations: a, adductor muscle; avg, average; b, body; F, F mtDNA ratio in female samples; Fm, F mtDNA ratio in male samples; M, M mtDNA ratio in male samples; m, mantle; MAD, median absolute deviation; mdn, median; NA, calculation not possible; s.d., standard deviation; w, whole animal; ♀, number of female samples; ♂, number of male samples.
Statistics were calculated on all suitable technical replicates available for each sample. Three replicates were used for each sample (except for a female adductor, where two were used; Supplementary Table 2). No M mtDNA was detected in class 2 adductors and mantles.