Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 24;11(3):e0151998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151998

Table 3. Associations between error count of PPH management and staff and institutional factors.

Univariate analysis for vignette 1 and vignette 2.

Staff and institutional factors Vignette 1 Vignette 2
IRR [95% CI] P-value IRR [95% CI] P-value
Staff factors
Age (10 years) 1.19 [1.10; 1.30] <0.001 1.14 [1.07; 1.21] <0.001
Experience (10 years) 1.17 [1.08; 1.27] <0.001 1.14 [1.07; 1.20] <0.001
Full-time practice 0.82 [0.70; 0.96] 0.014 0.97 [0.86; 1.09] 0.594
Level of risk taking (high and moderate) 1.29 [1.09; 1.53] 0.004 0.99 [0.87; 1.13] 0.880
Fear of malpractice (high and moderate) 1.00 [0.86; 1.17] 0.959 0.91 [0.82; 1.02] 0.101
Unit/institutional factors
Status 0.503 - 0.561
  Public university -
  Other public 1.15 [0.89; 1.48] 1.07 [0.90; 1.28]
  Private 1.04 [0.77; 1.41] 1.12 [0.91; 1.38]
Level of neonatal care 0.699 - 0.082
  Level 1 -
  Level 2 0.99 [0.79; 1.23] 0.94 [0.81; 1.09]
  Level 3 0.90 [0.69; 1.17] 0.82 [0.68; 0.98]
Births/midwife ratio (100 births) 0.94 [0.90; 0.99] 0.010 0.96 [0.93; 0.99] 0.022
Mortality and morbidity reviews 0.86 [0.68; 1.08] 0.185 0.78 [0.67; 0.91] 0.002