Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 24;11(3):e0152229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152229

Table 2. Discharge simulation results of two calibration and validation experiments: RE, NASH and RMSE values (m3/s).

Station Calibration(1998–2001) Validation(2002–2012)
RE(%) NASH RMSE RE(%) NASH RMSE
Gauge-Chiang Saen 8.3 0.508 1679 -19.8 0.588 1190
Gauge-Luang Prabang -1.9 0.722 2216 -16.1 0.655 1557
Gauge-Nong Khai 7.5 0.620 2860 -12.8 0.621 2036
Gauge-Mukdahan -9.2 0.688 4995 -17.2 0.693 3927
Gauge-Pakse -2.8 0.670 6479 -20.1 0.669 4917
Gauge-Stung Treng -2.6 0.722 8419 -15.8 0.741 5536
TRMM 3B42 V7-Chiang Saen 2.3 0.656 1402 -7.5 0.644 1106
TRMM 3B42 V7-Luang Prabang -8.5 0.684 2250 -0.8 0.679 1504
TRMM 3B42 V7-Nong Khai 2.1 0.679 2418 -1.2 0.673 1890
TRMM 3B42 V7-Mukdahan 12.8 0.642 4853 -1.0 0.747 3565
TRMM 3B42 V7-Pakse 12.6 0.675 5870 6.2 0.738 4375
TRMM 3B42 V7-Stung Treng 9.7 0.724 7617 10.2 0.754 5398