Table 3. RE values at each station for 2 year, 4 year and 8 year calibration periods for the TRMM simulation and gauge simulation.
Bold numbers represent a better result compared to the other simulation (i.e., less variation).
| Scenarios | TRMM-simulation | Gauge-simulation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calibration(%) | Validation(%) | Change* | Calibration(%) | Validation(%) | Change | |
| Chiang Saen-2 years | 1.2 | -13.4 | 0.15 | -3.9 | -19.9 | 0.16 |
| Chiang Saen-4 years | 2.3 | -7.5 | 0.10 | 8.3 | -19.8 | 0.28 |
| Chiang Saen-8 years | 0.1 | -11.0 | 0.11 | -7.0 | -22.9 | 0.16 |
| Luang Prabang-2 years | -3.9 | -8.5 | 0.05 | -7.7 | -16.5 | 0.09 |
| Luang Prabang-4 years | -8.5 | -0.8 | 0.08 | -1.9 | -16.1 | 0.14 |
| Luang Prabang-8 years | -4.4 | -1.6 | 0.03 | -11.9 | -16.0 | 0.04 |
| Nong Khai-2 years | 0.9 | -4.9 | 0.06 | 5.2 | -10.6 | 0.16 |
| Nong Khai-4 years | 2.1 | -1.2 | 0.03 | 7.5 | -12.8 | 0.20 |
| Nong Khai-8 years | -1.4 | -3.8 | 0.02 | -4.1 | -11.9 | 0.08 |
| Mukdahan-2 years | -6.1 | -26.6 | 0.21 | -2.8 | -34.2 | 0.31 |
| Mukdahan-4 years | 12.8 | -1.0 | 0.14 | -9.2 | -17.2 | 0.08 |
| Mukdahan-8 years | 5.3 | -2.2 | 0.08 | 3.5 | -20.8 | 0.24 |
| Pakse-2 years | 1.1 | -16.0 | 0.17 | -8.3 | -34.6 | 0.26 |
| Pakse-4 years | 12.6 | 6.2 | 0.06 | -2.8 | -20.1 | 0.17 |
| Pakse-8 years | 9.8 | 5.8 | 0.04 | -2.6 | -22.7 | 0.20 |
| Stung Treng-2 years | 7.0 | -8.6 | 0.16 | -5.0 | -25.9 | 0.21 |
| Stung Treng-4 years | 9.8 | 10.2 | 0.00 | -2.7 | -15.8 | 0.13 |
| Stung Treng-8 years | 7.9 | 13.1 | 0.05 | -5.3 | -16.7 | 0.11 |
* Change is calculated as the absolute value of RE(in validation)-RE(in calibration). It indicates how much RE change in validation period.