Table 2.
Odds of Unmet Need for Contraceptive Services and Highly Effective Contraceptive Method Use, by Enabling Resources and Health Needs
Oddsa of Unmet Need for Contraceptive Servicesb |
95% CI |
Oddsa of Using Highly Effective Methodc |
95% CI |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Enabling Resources | ||||
Currently insured | 0.7 | 0.2, 2.7 | 1.0 | 1.0, 1.1 |
Has usual source of healthcare | 1.6 | 0.7, 3.9 | 1.0 | 0.5, 2.2 |
Attended post-partum check-up within 8 weeks of delivery | 0.4* | 0.2, 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.5, 2.1 |
Visited a doctor's office for a routine visit in past 12 months (not including prenatal care) | 0.8 | 0.4, 1.6 | 1.3 | 0.6, 2.5 |
Visited healthcare provider to discuss contraception since pregnancy | 0.3* | 0.2, 0.6 | 1.6 | 0.8, 3.1 |
Health Needs | ||||
Perceived health status fair or poor | 1.3 | 0.5, 2.9 | 1.4 | 0.6, 3.0 |
Has chronic health condition | 0.7 | 0.3, 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.5, 1.7 |
Index pregnancy unintended | 0.6 | 0.3, 1.3 | 2.5* | 1.3, 4.8 |
Odds ratios generated by logistic regression analyses. All analyses controlled for age, race, Ethnicity, level of education, relationship status, parity, time since last birth and site of recruitment.
Women not desiring pregnancy /not sterile but who were not currently using a contraceptive method were defined as having unmet need for contraceptive services.
Highly effective contraceptive methods include implant and intrauterine device.
p<0.05