Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar;60(1):36–46.

Table 4.

QAREL ratings14

Item # Criterion
1 Was the test evaluated in a sample of subjects who were representative of those to whom the authors intended the results to be applied?
2 Was the test performed by raters who were representative of those to whom the authors intended the results to be applied?
3 Were raters blinded to the findings of other raters during the study?
4 Were raters blinded to their own prior findings of the test under evaluation?
5 Were raters blinded to the subjects’ disease status or the results of the accepted reference standard for the target disorder (or variable) being evaluated?
6 Were raters blinded to clinical information that was not intended to form part of the study design or testing procedure?
7 Were raters blinded to additional cues that were not part of the test?
8 Was the order of examination varied?
9 Was the stability (or theoretical stability) of the variable being measured taken into account when determining the suitability of the time interval between repeated measures?
10 Was the test applied correctly and interpreted appropriately?
11 Were appropriate statistical measures of agreement used?
QAREL assessments for articles in review
Item # Byfield Fryer Kim Kmita Lindsay O’Haire Paydar Potter Riddle Simmonds Sutton Van Kessel Suwanasri
1 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
2 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
3 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
4 Y Y
5 Y Y Y
6 Y Y Y Y
7 Y Y Y
8 Y Y Y Y Y
9
10 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
11 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Total Y 4 7 6 10 3 6 2 4 5 5 6 7 2