Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 17;103(4):1162–1170. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.123448

TABLE 2.

Stratified analysis of FTO genotype and weight-loss according to study characteristics1

TA vs. TT
AA vs. TT
Subgroups Sample size, n Studies, n WMD 95% CI I2 value P between groups WMD 95% CI I2 value P between groups
Mean age 0.88 0.95
 <50 966 4 −0.21 (−0.73, 0.31) 0.0 −0.42 (−1.12, 0.28) 3.2
 ≥50 5985 6 −0.17 (−0.48, 0.15) 0.0 −0.44 (−0.85, −0.04) 1.4
Mean BMI at baseline 0.61 0.08
 <35 2452 7 −0.25 (−0.64, 0.14) 0.0 −0.79 (−1.33, −0.26) 0.0
 ≥35 4499 3 −0.11 (−0.48, 0.26) 0.0 −0.17 (−0.63, 0.30) 0.0
Duration 0.51 0.74
 <1 y 1204 4 −0.07 (−0.49, 0.35) 0.0 −0.53 (−1.18, 0.12) 0.0
 ≥1 y 5747 6 −0.25 (−0.60, 0.09) 0.0 −0.40 (−0.82, 0.02) 25.1
Intervention 0.12 0.11
 Diet intervention only 2345 6 −0.40 (−0.79, −0.01) 0.0 −0.72 (−1.21, −0.23) 0.0
 Other2 4606 4 0.02 (−0.35, 0.39) 0.0 −0.15 (−0.65, 0.49) 0.0
Sex 0.28 0.61
 Mixed 6438 7 −0.24 (−0.53, 0.05) 0.0 −0.46 (−0.83, −0.10) 0.0
 Female 513 3 0.17 (−0.52, 0.86) 0.0 −0.09 (−1.48, 1.30) 15.5
Region 0.40 0.38
 America 4593 3 −0.07 (−0.51, 0.37) 0.0 −0.22 (−0.75, 0.32) 0.0
 Europe 2154 6 −0.34 (−0.72, 0.03) 0.0 −0.66 (−1.14, −0.18) 0.0
 Asia 204 1 0.20 (−0.60, 1.00) NA 0.30 (−0.79, −0.09) NA
Adjusted for baseline BMI or body weight 0.66 0.19
 Yes 2761 6 −0.26 (−0.60, 0.08) 0.0 −0.70 (−1.16, −0.23) 0.0
 No 4190 4 −0.04 (−0.51, 0.43) 0.0 −0.09 (−0.63, 0.46) 0.0
1

Differences in weight loss after intervention between FTO genotypes across studies were pooled with the use of fixed-effect models. The heterogeneity between studies for each group was tested by I2. P values between groups were tested with the use of Cochran’s Q test. FTO, fat mass and obesity–associated; NA, not available; WMD, weighted mean difference.

2

Includes studies with exercise interventions, both exercise and diet interventions, or nutritional education.