Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb;12(1):12–17. doi: 10.2174/1573403X11666150407110849

Table 2.

Radiation doses in recent CTO registries and meta-analyses.

Study type Characteristics Year CTO lesions (n) Radiation skin injury (%) Fluoroscopy time
Lin et al. [32] Retrospective study 2014 516 NR 43 ± 27 # 42 ± 24 ##
El Sabbagh et al. [7] Metanalysis Retrograde only 2014 3493 0.5% 82 ± 34
Christopoulos et al. [33] Registry 2014 496 NR 41 (26-65) *
Michael et al. [34] Registry 2013 1361 NR 42 ± 29
Karmpaliotis et al. [35] Registry Retrograde only 2012 462 NR 61 ± 40
Tsuchikane et al. [36] Registry Retrograde only 2013 801 NR 95 ± 52
Patel et al. [37] Metanalysis 2013 18941 <0.01 NR
Galassi et al. [38] Registry 2011 1983 NR 42 ± 47
Morino et al. [8] Registry 2010 528 0 45 (1-301) *
Aguiar-Souto et al. [39] Retrospective study 2010 227 NR 32 (19-47) *

#CI-AKI group, ## non CI-AKI group, CI-AKI: contrast induced acute kidney injury, * Median (range)