Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2015 Dec 11;123(4):916–917. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.040

Table 2.

Results of the Age-Adjusted Cox Regression of the Effect of Statins on Cataract Progression: Hazard Ratios and 95% Confidence Limits using Unmatched Statin-Use Propensity Scores.

N HR 95% CI

Cataract surgery incidence
 All participants 2771 1.90 1.17–3.10

 Stratified by sex:
  Females 1540 2.46 1.25–4.85
  Males 1231 1.48 0.74–2.93

 Stratified by age group:
  Age < 75 years 1824 2.52 1.20–5.33
  Age ≥ 75 years 947 1.41 0.74–2.68

Progression of cortical lens opacity
 All participants 2609 1.52 1.08–2.12

 Stratified by sex:
  Females 1438 1.67 1.03–2.71
  Males 1171 1.40 0.89–2.20

 Stratified by age group:
  Age < 75 years 1738 1.49 0.94–2.36
  Age ≥ 75 years 871 1.57 0.96–2.58

Progression of posterior subcapsular lens opacity
 All participants 2673 1.84 1.25–2.71

 Stratified by sex:
  Females 1480 2.27 1.31–3.94
  Males 1193 1.51 0.89–2.58

 Stratified by age group:
  Age < 75 years 1768 2.11 1.22–3.65
  Age ≥ 75 years 905 1.54 0.88–2.68

HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval. Boldface hazard ratios and confidence intervals are significant (P < 0.05). Analyses of all participants are age and sexadjusted. The analyses stratified by sex are adjusted for age, and the analyses stratified by age are adjusted for age and sex.