Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Public Health. 2016 Jan 5;61(2):199–207. doi: 10.1007/s00038-015-0774-8

Table 1.

Socio-demographic and other characteristics according to cigarette smoking status among grade 9 high school students, Tirgu Mures, Romania, 2014

Total
n = 1835
Never smokers
n = 859
Non-current
smokers n = 534
Current smokers
n = 442
p
Age, years, mean (SD) 14.9 (0.5) 14.9 (0.5) 14.9 (0.5) 15.0 (0.6) 0.003
Male (%) 46.5 45.9 49.8 43.9 0.157
Family size ≤4 (%) 78.1 77.9 77.0 79.9 0.541
Ethnicity (%)
  Romanian 55.1 56.0 53.9 55.0 0.845
  Hungarian 42.1 41.4 43.4 41.6
  Other 2.8 2.6 2.7 3.4
General high school (%) 30.0 36.4 29.6 18.1 <0.001
Household smoking (%) 59.9 49.4 63.7 75.8 <0.001
≥50 % of friends smoke (%) 32.3 15.0 33.7 64.3 <0.001
At least one close friend smokes# (%) 58.6 39.6 64.4 88.5 <0.001
E-cigarette (%) 38.5 8.0 57.7 74.4 <0.001
Cigar (%) 31.4 1.2 51.4 66.1 <0.001
Pipe (%) 6.8 0.9 6.7 18.1 <0.001
Waterpipe (%) 21.1 7.7 24.9 42.8 <0.001
Chewing tobacco (%) 1.6 0.1 1.9 4.1 <0.001
Snus/other oral tobacco product (%) 3.9 0.1 4.7 10.4 <0.001
Snuff (%) 1.1 0.2 0.6 3.6 <0.001
Any smokeless tobacco product (%) 5.4 0.5 6.9 13.3 <0.001
Sensation-seeking, mean (SD) 26.3 (6.47) 24.3a (6.12) 27.2b (6.10) 29.0c (6.34) <0.001
Depressive symptoms, mean (SD) 15.04 (9.78) 13.2a (8.75) 15.2b (9.80) 18.3c (10.72) <0.001
Decisional balance##
  Negative consequences, mean (SD) 3.93 (0.97) 4.11a (0.91) 3.98b (0.96) 3.54c (0.99) <0.001
  Coping–reinforcement, mean (SD) 1.83 (0.88) 1.55a (0.71) 1.75a (0.81) 2.46a (0.95) <0.001
  Social benefits, mean (SD) 1.55 (0.64) 1.45a (0.57) 1.51a (0.58) 1.79b (0.74) <0.001
#

The range of number of closest friends is between 0 and 3

##

Based on a three-factor model (Plummer et al. 2001), and the means of items are provided here

a, b, c, d

Means sharing a common superscript are not statistically different at p < 0.05 according to Games–Howell post hoc test

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure