Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2016 Feb 17;58:110–116. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.025

Table 4.

Multilevel Models Predicting More Favorable Evaluations of Consequences

Positive Evaluations Negative Evaluations

Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2
B (SE) B (SE) B (SE) B (SE)
Level 2
Male Sex -- 0.01 (.07) -- −0.13 (.12)
Age -- 0.02 (.03) -- 0.10 (.05)
Fraternity/Sorority Membership -- −0.12 (.07) -- −0.11 (.13)
Positive Expectancies Person Mean -- 0.37 (.03)*** -- 0.09 (.06)
Negative Expectancies Person Mean -- −0.16 (.03)*** -- 0.16 (.06)**
High-intensity Drinking Person Mean 0.06 (.04) 0.08 (.04)* −.02 (.06) 0.01 (.06)
Level 1
Time Trend (i.e., week of study) -- 0.02 (.01)* -- −0.04 (.01)**
Weekend -- 0.00 (.03) -- 0.27 (.07)***
Context
 Drinking with Othersa -- 0.03 (.06) -- 0.26 (.17)
 Drinking at Bar/Partyb -- 0.09 (.03)* -- −0.23 (.08)**
 Drinking – Other (Where)b -- 0.04 (.05) -- −0.06 (.13)
Positive Expectancies -- 0.09 (.02)*** -- 0.07 (.04)
Negative Expectancies -- −0.01 (.02) -- 0.05 (.03)
High-intensity Drinking 0.08 (.01)*** 0.05 (.01)*** −0.04 (.02) −0.08 (.03)**

Note. Pos Eval N=339 people, n=4,041 days; Neg Eval N=321 people, n=2,028 days.

a

Reference Category is Drinking Alone.

b

Reference Category is Drinking at Home.

*

p<.05,

**

p<.01,

***

p<.001.