Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychol. 2016 Feb 11;52(4):629–639. doi: 10.1037/dev0000096

Table 3.

Prospective Associations of Friends’ Engagement in Non-Problem Talk and Problem Talk and Responses to Friends’ Problem Statements with Later Emotional Closeness

DV = Time 2 Emotional Closeness

Actor Effect Partner Effect
SPE F value SPE F value
Participation in Non-Problem and Problem Talk
Friend-Problem Statements −.01 0.07 .09 6.66*
Own-Problem Statements .07 4.34* .01 0.15
Non-Problem Statements −.04 0.94 −.04 1.25
Engaged Responses
Support/Agree .05 2.24 .09 5.97*
Question −.01 0.05 .10 8.70**
Related Experience −.00 0.01 .03 0.69
Information/Opinion .03 0.66 .10 8.99**
Acknowledge/Prompt .02 0.28 .04 1.31
Advice Giving .03 0.57 .05 2.23
Negative Responses
Changing Subject −.07 4.20* .04 1.11
Minimization/Non-Support −.03 .85 −.03 0.85
Silence/No Response −.03 .78 .01 0.06
Humor Responses
Humor −.06 2.83 −.01 0.05

Notes. Time 1 Emotional Closeness is controlled in all analyses. SPE = Standardized Parameter Estimate.

*

p< .05.

**

p < .01.