Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Pediatr. 2015 Sep 26;16(3):247–253. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.07.009

Appendix Table 3.

Cost-effectiveness And Average Cost Of SNaX Based On Fruit And Vegetable Servings, Cafeteria Participation, And Snack Sales Per Student Over Five Week Program Period

Outcomes Incremental change (Mean) CE ratio ($/outcome) 95% CI Avg cost per outcome ($/outcome) 95% CI
Cafeteria Servings
 Fruit§ 1.75 $0.88 0.14 to 1.62 $2.50 1.3 to 3.7
 Vegetables - - - - -
 Free/reduced lunch* 1.00 $1.54 0.03 to 3.05 $4.37 0.09 to 8.66
 Full-price lunch* 0.25 $6.16 1.33 to 11 $17.50 3.78 to 31.22
 All lunches 1.25 $1.23 0.27 to 2.2 $3.50 1.3 to 5.7
Snack Sales −1.25 $1.23 0.75 to 1.72 $3.50 2.4 to 4.6

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; Avg., average; CE, cost-effectiveness

Note: Incremental change represents adjusted differences-in-differences estimate of pre-to-post change within and between control and intervention schools

§

As an example for interpretive purposes, each student, on average, ate 1.75 more fruits over the five week period. Achieving this goal, per student, cost $0.88 per fruit consumed.

Vegetable outcomes were not included in economic e valuation because there was no statistically significant intervention effect.

*

Includes 5 schools only (2 intervention and 3 control schools); because of the high number of students who were eligible for the NSLP in 4 schools, LAUSD allowed all students to receive free meals at those schools. NSLP data were not collected for one intervention school.

Excludes one control school; one school’s store was closed due to structural damage.