Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 9;6:20770. doi: 10.1038/srep20770

Table 2. Statistical analysis of the data shown in Fig. 1b: change in bending modulus of n- and g-HAP/PLLA and PLLA samples with time.

  Weeks after implantation
0 4 12 20 28 36
g-HAP/PLLA vs. n-HAP/PLLA n.s n.s n.s c n.s n.s.
g-HAP/PLLA vs. PLLA a n.s d b c c
n-HAP/PLLA vs. PLLA n.s n.s d n.s c c

aWith a significant difference at P < 0.02.

bWith a significant difference at P < 0.01.

cWith a significant difference at P < 0.005.

dWith a significant difference at P < 0.05.

en.s. = not significant.