Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 15;13(3):324. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13030324

Table A1.

Ratios of geometric means (95% confidence interval) of urinary cadmium by study sites a.

Cadmium Model 1 b Model 2 c
Winston-Salem 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
Baltimore 0.71 (0.29,1.77) 0.61 (0.38,0.99)
Chicago 0.80 (0.36,1.79) 0.82 (0.52,1.30)
Los Angeles 0.90 (0.41,1.98) 0.81 (0.52,1.26)
New York City 0.91 (0.41,1.98) 0.73 (0.47,1.15)
Saint Paul 0.88 (0.33,2.35) 0.80 (0.49,1.32)

a Results are in bold where it reached statistical significance (α = 0.05) in a model. b Adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, education, annual family income, smoking status, pack-year and secondhand smoke. c Adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, education, annual family income, smoking status, pack-year and high-Cd food (fruits, vegetables, grains, nuts, red meat and shellfish).