Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 18;13(3):337. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13030337

Table 1.

Descriptive data of included studies (n = 16).

Author Year Country GA Age + Post–Natal Age, Days Design Study Groups n Intervention Sampling Times Successful Saliva Sampling Storage Temperature (°C) Analyze Method Intra/Inter CV Cortisol Response
Painful
Cignacco et al. 2009 Switzerland [44] 28–31 <14 Single group Sucrose 9 Heel lance –25, +30 99% Not stated RIA Not stated Not significant
Cong et al. 2011 USA [45] 30–32 2–9 Randomized crossover Incubator care vs. SSC 30 min or 80 min 18 + 10 Heel lance 0, +20 * −70 Not stated 4.8/6.3 Not stated
Badiee et al. 2013 Iran [46] 32–37 1–30 Randomized clinical study Formula odor vs. breast milk odor 25 + 25 Heel lance 0, +20 Not stated Not stated ELISA Not stated Not stated
Badiee et al. 2014 Iran [47] 26–34 <20 Randomized clinical study Standard care vs. Co-bedding 50 + 50 Heel lance 0, +20 Not stated Not stated ELISA Not stated Not stated ##
Campbell–Yeo et al. 2014 Canada [48] 28–36 Mean 12.0 and 18.96 Randomized clinical study Standard care vs. Co-bedding 62 + 72 Heel lance 0, +20 57% −20 EIA 2.24/2.47 Decrease ##
Kleberg et al. 2008 Sweden [49] 23–31 <35 Randomized crossover Standard care vs NIDCAP 36 Eye-screening exam. 0, +30, +60, +4 h 75% −22 RIA /6.0 –12.0 Increase #
Ivars et al. 2012 Sweden [50] 27–33 4–86 Randomized crossover Control vs oral glucose 11 Nasopharyngeal suctioning 0, +30 98% −22 RIA /6.0 –12.0 Not significant
Boyer et al. 2004 Canada [51] <31 1–7 Randomized controlled study Water vs. Sucrose for one week 105 Different painful procedures 0, +30 54% −10 Not stated Not stated Not significant
Painful + Handling
Magnano et al. 1992 USA [52] 30–37 5–53 Two group comparative design Control vs. Cocaine exposed infants 47 + 11 Heel lance and Physical exam. 0, +30 79% Not stated RIA 3.3/10.1 Increase # and Increase #
Davis et al. 2004 USA [53] 33–34 3–6 Two group comparative design Control vs. Antenatal Betam-ethasone 9 + 9 Heel lance and Physical exam. 0, +20–25, +40–45 98% −20 DELFIA 4.3/11.99 Decrease ## and Increase #
Handling
Mörelius et al. 2006 Sweden [29] 23–38 2–7 and 10–18 Two group comparative design Full-term vs preterm 39 + 30 Diaper change 0, +30 90% −22 RIA /6.0–12.0 Not significant
Mörelius et al. 2012 Sweden [54] 24–37 ≤112 Randomized clinical study Standard care vs. family care 137 + 152 Diaper change 0, +30 97% −22 RIA /6.0–12.0 Not significant
Candia et al. 2014 Brazil [55] 26–36 1–33 Single group Lateral/supine position vs. Prone position 21 Prone position 0, +30 76% Not stated ECL Not stated Decrease ##
Pleasant
Mörelius et al. 2005 Sweden [56] 25–33 2–21 and 4–26 Crossover Incubator care vs. SSC 17 SSC 0, +30 89% −22 RIA /6.0–12.0 Not significant
Dorn et al. 2014 Germany [57] 30–37 Mean 4.9 Randomized clinical study Control vs. Music vs. Maternal voice 22 + 20 + 20 Music and Maternal voice −10, +10 65% −20 ELISA Not stated Not significant
Schwilling et al. 2015 Germany [58] 23–33 <21 Single group Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
20 Music 0, +25, +4 h 91% −20 Mass- spec-trometry Not stated Decrease ##

+ Gestational age in weeks at birth; # See Table 2 for details; ## See Table 3 for details; * Only reports how many subjects provided complete set of data, not how many were included. RIA = Radioimmunoassay; ELISA= Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; ECL = Electrochemiluminescence; EIA = Sensitive enzyme immunoassay; DELFIA = Competitive solid phase time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay with fluorometric endpoint.