Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2015 Oct 1;171:184–191. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.005

Table 2.

Comparison of AIC of various models. Models were compared in a predetermined stepwise fashion based on biological significance and increasing complexity of the variables. Models with lower AIC are considered better fitting. Best fitting model in italics.

Model Variables included in the model AIC
1 Intercept and random effects for animal and year (null model) 7415
2 Rearing, sex, age, and random effects for animal and year (covariate only model) 7064
3 Rearing, sex, age, origin and random effects for animal and year 7061
4 Rearing, sex, age, origin, response to novel object, and random effects for animal
and year
7027
5 Rearing, sex, age, origin, response to novel object, enrichment device, and
random effects for animal and year
7024
6 Rearing, sex, age, origin, response to novel object, enrichment device, pairing,
and random effects for animal and year
6985