Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015;37(9):899–916. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1067290

Table 5.

CDR machine learning model performance

Naive Bayes 0 0.5 1+ 0 0.5 0.5 1+ 0 1+
Accuracy 80.1% 81.8% 94.0% 98.3%
CI 75.36 – 84.84% 77.2 – 86.4% 91.2 – 96.8% 96.8 – 99.8%
G-mean 81.5% 74.2% 74.2% 77.1% 77.1% 84.9% 84.9% 93.8% 93.8%
Sensitivity 92.2% 61.3% 76.0% 92.2% 64.5% 100.0% 72.0% 100% 88.0%
Specificity 72.0% 89.9% 98.8% 64.5% 92.2% 72.0% 100% 88.0% 100%
Decision Tree 0 0.5 1+ 0 0.5 0.5 1+ 0 1+
Accuracy 80.5% 81.0% 94.1% 97.7%
CI 75.79 – 85.2% 76.3 – 85.7% 91.3–96.9% 95.9– 99.5%
G-Mean 79.9% 73.4% 89.1% 75.8% 75.8% 94.1% 94.1% 95.6% 95.6%
Sensitivity 94.2% 58.1% 80.0% 92.2% 62.4% 94.6% 92.0% 100% 84.0%
Specificity 67.8% 92.7% 99.2% 62.4% 92.2% 92.0% 94.6% 84.0% 100%
Logistic Regression 0 0.5 1+ 0 0.5 0.5 1+ 0 1+
Accuracy 70.0% 71.9% 91.2% 98.8%
CI 64.6 – 75.5% 66.6 – 77.2% 87.8 – 94.6% 97.5 – 100.0%
G-Mean 67.1% 60.9% 81.9% 65.6% 65.6% 81.2% 81.2% 96.5% 96.5%
Sensitivity 85.5% 44.2% 68.8% 84.1% 51.2% 95.8% 68.8% 99.3% 93.8%
Specificity 52.7% 83.9% 97.6% 51.2% 84.1% 68.8% 95.8% 93.8% 99.3%

Note: CI = confidence interval; G-mean = geometric mean.