Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Disabil Rehabil. 2015 Jul 6;38(9):853–857. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1062926

Table 3.

Percentage of participants identifying goals within each category relative to the three characteristics (age, UE functional capacity, dominance).

Group ADL p IADL p Work p Leisure p Non-specific p
Age <65 90% .11 92% .56 10% >.99 33% .57 44% .17
≥ 65 71% 100% 6% 41% 65%
Functional Capacitya Low 83% .04* 100% .55 14% .76 29% .47 43% .4
Moderate 92% 92% 8% 33% 46%
High 64% 92% 8% 50% 67%
Dominance Dominant affected 83% >.99 92% .62 11% .68 36% >.99 53% .62
Non- Dominant affected 86% 97% 7% 35% 45%
a

: Stratified by ARAT (Action Research Arm Test) score: low functional capacity, ≤ 20 points; moderate functional capacity, 21–39 points; high functional capacity, ≥ 40 points

*

significant at p= 0.05