Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 11;66(645):e277–e284. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X684373

Table 4.

Appraisers’ suggested actions for feedback reports A to H: distribution of responses

Report, n (%)

A B C D E F G H

N = 100 N = 95 N = 93 N = 91 N = 88 N = 89 N = 87 N= 87
Repeating patient and colleague surveys
No need to repeat either survey 90 (90) 45 (47) 43 (46) 17 (19) 87 (99) 57 (64) 46 (53) 85 (98)
Repeat the patient survey only 0 (0) 45 (47) 3 (3) 33 (36) 1 (1) 12 (13) 6 (7) 2 (2)
Repeat the colleague survey only 7 (7) 0 (0) 17 (18) 2 (2) 0 (0) 2 (2) 20 (23) 0 (0)
Repeat both surveys 3 (3) 5 (5) 30 (32) 39 (43) 0 (0) 18 (20) 15 (17) 0 (0)

Personal development plan (PDP) actions
No specific PDP action(s) or training 43 (43) 12 (13) 1 (1) 1 (1) 65 (74) 18 (20) 5 (6) 63 (72)
Encourage to include training in PDP 55 (55) 57 (60) 49 (53) 40 (44) 23 (26) 61 (69) 62 (71) 24 (28)
Mandate to include training in PDP 2 (2) 26 (27) 43 (46) 50 (55) 0 (0) 10 (11) 20 (23) 0 (0)

Other recommended action(s)a
No other action needed 70 (70) 32 (34) 7 (8) 2 (2) 77 (88) 42 (47) 24 (28) 63 (72)
Review PDP actions at next appraisal 30 (30) 60 (63) 80 (86) 73 (80) 8 (9) 42 (47) 60 (69) 17 (20)
Refer to the responsible officer 0 (0) 1 (1) 4 (4) 6 (7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1) 0 (0)
Other action recommended 0 (0) 8 (8) 13 (14) 25 (27) 3 (3) 9 (10) 10 (11) 7 (8)
a

Percentages may add up to more than 100% because appraisers could select more than one action.

PDP = professional development plan. Emboldened figures represent modal response(s).