Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 28;11(3):e0149762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149762

Table 3. Effects of different procedures on the recombination efficiency (%).

Genome editing Time point of sucrose addition Subculture Inoculation stage
First subculture Second subculture Once Twice Thrice Log phase Stationary phase Late stationary phase
ΔfadM 1.9±0.14 5.3±0.47 4.5±0.31 5.4±0.41 6.0±0.27 1.1±0.09 7.3±0.20 8.9±0.41
ΔtesB 2.0±0.09 6.1±0.11 4.2±0.23 5.9±0.13 6.3±0.31 0.9±0.06 8.3±0.32 9.1±0.46
ΔtesA 1.4±0.14 5.5±0.41 4.4±0.29 5.6±0.31 5.9±0.32 0.6±0.08 7.2±0.28 8.3±0.36
ΔfadM:: FAR 2.5±0.17 5.2±0.29 4.1±0.21 5.4±0.19 5.9±0.24 1.1±0.09 7.4±0.27 8.5±0.29
FAR insertion 2.1±0.20 5.0±0.32 4.4±0.31 5.7±0.27 6.2±0.35 1.0±0.05 7.4±0.35 9.1±0.43

Note: Recombination efficiency = number of clonies without cat-sacB/number of total streaked clonies×100%.For the test of time point of sucrose addition, other parameters were kept the same: subculturing twice after sucrose addition and inoculating at the stationary phase. For the test of subculture times, other parameters were kept the same: adding sucrose at the second subculture and inoculating at the stationary phase. For the test of inoculation stage, other parameters were kept the same: adding sucrose at the second subculture and subculturing thrice after sucrose addition, Values are the mean of three biological replicates ± SD