Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 23;20(4):331–342. doi: 10.1093/deafed/env028

Table 3.

Correlations (Spearman’s rho) between psychosocial/motor quotients and measures of language and communication ability

Social development quotient Self-help quotient Gross motor quotient Fine motor quotient Expressive language quotient Language comprehension quotient PEACH
Social development quotient 1.00 0.644* (n = 301) 0.560* (n = 301) 0.587* (n = 300) 0.740* (n = 283) 0.748* (n = 283) 0.504* (n = 222)
Self-help quotient 1.00 0.712* (n = 301) 0.681* (n = 300) 0.551* (n = 283) 0.560* (n = 283) 0.368* (n = 222)
Gross motor quotient 1.00 0.586* (n = 300) 0.467* (n = 283) 0.444* (n = 283) 0.316* (n = 222)
Fine motor quotient 1.00 0.513* (n = 283) 0.534* (n = 283) 0.334* (n = 222)
Expressive language quotient 1.00 0.914* (n = 283) 0.523* (n = 213)
Language comprehension quotient 1.00 0.558* (n = 213)
PEACH 1.00

Note. The data for the number of participants varies for each correlation due to different numbers of children having complete data on each measure. PEACH = Parents’ Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children.

*Significant correlations at p < .001.