Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 23;20(4):331–342. doi: 10.1093/deafed/env028

Table 4.

Effect estimate and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the change in mean of each developmental quotient associated with a change in the predictor from Value 1 to Value 2 depicted in parentheses (Value 1: Value 2)a

Social Self-help Gross motor Fine motor
Predictor Effect estimate (95% CI) p Effect estimate (95% CI) p Effect estimate (95% CI) p Effect estimate (95% CI) p
Child
 Additional disability (none: one or more) −21.6 (−30.0, −12.8) <.001 −24.6 (−32.5, −16.8) <.001 −33.9 (−42.0, −25.6) <.001 −20.5 (−27.7, −13.3) <.001
 Birth weightb 6.5 (1.8, 11.4) .005 8.2 (4.2, 12.2) <.001 9.9 (4.9, 15.1) <.001 5.6 (1.9, 9.3) .003
 Gender (male: female) 9.8 (1.9, 17.8) .01 15.5 (8.8, 22.3) <.001 6.6 (−1.1, 14.3) .09 12.6 (6.7, 18.5) <.001
 Age at first fittingb −3.6 (−10.2, 3.4) .31 −0.6 (−6.6, 5.4) .85 0.7 (−6.0, 7.7) .84 0.4 (−4.9, 5.7) .88
 Age at first switch-onb −6.3 (−17.1, 8.1) .37 −0.7 (−12.5, 11.2) .91 7.5 (−5.1, 22.8) .27 −0.2 (−10.6, 10.2) .97
 Device (hearing aid: cochlear implant)c 4.2 .65 0.0 .98 −8.8 .05 −1.0 .99
 4 frequency average (4FA) hearing level in the better earc .12 .96 .34 .88
  4FA for hearing aide usersb −11.8 1.4 8.4 1.6
  4FA for cochlear implant usersb −5.6 0.0 −3.2 2.1 .88
Family
 Maternal education .35 .31 .11 .06
  School: diploma 5.5 (−4.6, 15.9) 1.1 (−7.9, 10.0) 4.9 (−5.3, 15.4) 9.5 (1.5, 17.5)
  School: university 6.5 (−2.9, 16.1) −5.1 (−13.4, 3.1) −5.6 (−14.4, 3.5) 5.3 (−1.9, 12.4)
 Socio-economic statusa 2.4 (−2.7, 9.2) .42 0.6 (−4.4, 5.6) .83 −0.8 (−5.3, 5.3) .77 0.6 (−3.7, 5.0) .77
Educational intervention
 Communication mode (aural/oral: combined mode) −10.6 (−24.3, 26.8) .12 −11.3 (−22.5, 18.0) .03 −11.9 (−10.0, 36.0) .01 −7.2 (−10.6, 26.8) .09

Note. aFor categorical variables, Value 1 is the reference category.

bFor these variables, the effect estimate and 95% CI are for the change in the mean of the dependent variable associated with a change in the predictor from the first quartile value to the third quartile value, with the other predictors constant.

cThere are no CIs specified separately for device and 4FA hearing level in the better ear because the model included nonlinearities and interactions between device and hearing level.