Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 16;283(1826):20153008. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.3008

Table 1.

Effect of logging and topology on the robustness to secondary extinctions of tree–liana networks, analysed by means of GLMMs. Significance of p-values is provided by asterisks. Reference categories for the effects shown were ‘primary forest’ for forest type and ‘connected scenario’ for the extinction model.

factor level of factor estimate standard error (s.e.) z-value
intercept 0.36 0.09 4.19***
logging logged forest 0.12 0.09 1.23n.s.
extinction scenario random 0.32 0.03 9.25***
rare 0.55 0.03 15.88***
species richness −0.004 0.001 −2.96**
tree specialization 0.69 0.25 2.76**
logging × tree specialization logged forest −0.90 0.29 −3.15**
extinction scenario × tree specialization rare −0.72 0.21 −3.40***
random −1.15 0.21 −5.43***

**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, n.s. >0.05.