Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 15;2016:4916246. doi: 10.1155/2016/4916246

Table 3.

Correlation analysis between stiffness parameters and blood pressure levels.

Normal weight Obesity p (slope differences)
Model R p 95% CI Model R p 95% CI
Left common carotid artery distensibility −8.06E − 5x + 0.012 0.428 <0.001 −1,12E − 04–−5,00E − 05 −1.10E − 4x + 0.015 0.554 <0.001 −1,49E − 04–−7,2E − 05 0.232
Right common carotid artery distensibility −8.01E − 5x + 0.012 0.437 <0.001 −1,11E − 04–−4,9E − 05 −9.03E − 5x + 0.013 0.496 <0.001 −1,28E − 04–−5,3E − 05 0.672
Left common femoral artery distensibility −3.47E − 5x + 0.005 0.467 <0.001 −4,80E − 05–−2,2E − 05 −2.85E − 5x + 0.005 0.518 <0.001 −4,00E − 05–−1,7E − 05 0.502
Right common femoral artery distensibility −2.92E − 5x + 0.005 0.448 <0.001 −4,10E − 05–1,80E − 05 −2.57E − 5x + 0.004 0.399 <0.001 −4,00E − 05–−1,2E − 05 0.700
Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity 0.029x + 2.177 0.398 <0.001 0.016–0.042 0.026x + 2.369 0.433 <0.001 0.013–0.039 0.744
Carotid-radial pulse wave velocity 0.028x + 4.318 0.318 <0.001 0.015–0.040 0.027x + 4.111 0.359 <0.001 0.011–0.035 0.756

Analysis between arterial stiffness parameters (y-axis) and systolic blood pressure levels (x-axis). CI: confidence interval. All regressions reached statistical significance (p < 0.001). There were no differences in the slopes (model comparison) between normal weight and obese children. A p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.