TABLE 3.

Results of Multiple Logistic Regression Analyses to Identify Independent Predictors of Key Social Outcomes

Predictive Factors	OR (95% CI)	Risk Ratioa	P Valueb
Living and family arrangement social outcomes
Living on one’s own including in a dormitoryc,d
Any psychiatric disorder	0.47 (0.25–0.88)	0.51	.02
Ever married or lives with a partnerc,e
No predictors
Has childrend,e
Worse seizure outcome	1.46 (1.03–2.06)f	1.32	.03
History of internalizing disorders	2.89 (1.26–6.64)	2.05	.01
Employment and educational attainment outcomes
Employed ≥20 h/weekc
Learning problems	0.43 (0.22–0.82)	0.55	.01
Currently pursuing a post–high school degree or certificationc
No predictors
Either employed ≥20 h/wk or actively pursuing education beyond high schoold
Worse seizure outcome	0.57 (0.39–0.83)	0.92	.004
Learning problems	0.45 (0.21–0.98)	0.87	.04
Graduated from 4-y collegec,d,e
Worse seizure outcome	0.62 (0.45–0.86)	0.84	.004
Learning problems	0.35 (0.15–0.81)	0.59	.01
Any psychiatric disorder	0.32 (0.15–0.71)	0.60	.005
Other outcomes
Has a driver’s licensec
Worse seizure outcome	0.42 (0.27–0.66)	0.91	.0002
Learning disorder	0.35 (0.15–0.78)	0.84	.01
Encounters with law enforcemente
Externalizing disorders	3.27 (1.45–7.35)	2.51	.01

CI, confidence interval.

Estimates are adjusted for

^aBased on approximations using proportional hazards modeling.

^bP values are based on logistic regression.

^cage,

^dparental education, and

^egender, and where these were statistically significant predictors of a specific outcome.

^fA secondary analysis revealed this association was almost completely restricted to women who did not have a partner.